tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20257999.post6464358776108029342..comments2024-03-28T21:53:53.990+02:00Comments on Life in Israel: Is Olmert digging his hole deeper?Rafi G.http://www.blogger.com/profile/00699851287106903971noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20257999.post-11218989929812944302008-07-21T15:53:00.000+03:002008-07-21T15:53:00.000+03:00Talanksy's PR guy made the same point on the radio...Talanksy's PR guy made the same point on the radio this morning. Olmert's lawyers pounded away at Talanksky about the $72,000 when it is recorded in Shula Zaken's diaries. <BR/>I amde a similar point here <A HREF="http://jewishworker.blogspot.com/2008/07/olmerts-attorneys-making-another.html" REL="nofollow">Olmerts attorneys making another mistake </A>. They may be rigth from a legal perspective but from a PR perspective it is just making Olmert look worse and worse.blukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03774763780910614203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20257999.post-44528773184527146222008-07-21T12:06:00.000+03:002008-07-21T12:06:00.000+03:00but he has already admitted, supposedly, to having...but he has already admitted, supposedly, to having taken money from Talansky. The debate has been how much and how often. But that matters even less if Talansky is a money launderer. Even if Olmert took less, less frequently, but he took it from a money launderer, his troubles are that much greater!Rafi G.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00699851287106903971noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20257999.post-52372465994598779532008-07-21T12:04:00.000+03:002008-07-21T12:04:00.000+03:00It helps Olmert's case since the lawyers are tryin...It helps Olmert's case since the lawyers are trying to discredit the main witness (Talansky). It's the best option if there are no witnesses to contradict his testimony.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com