He (paraphrase): "If you were hit with shrapnel, and it was embedded inside you, and you had two choices for treatment, to risk having it removed, with only ??% chance of success of surviving the surgery, or leaving it inside of you, but not being 100%, which would you choose?"
Autonomy IS a defacto State.
This idea has been tried countless times: Annex part or all, but don't kick them out.
Do I think we can today? No. There is no excuse from continuing to talk about what should be.
Who does he think he's trying to fool?
ReplyDeleteHe (paraphrase): "If you were hit with shrapnel, and it was embedded inside you, and you had two choices for treatment, to risk having it removed, with only ??% chance of success of surviving the surgery, or leaving it inside of you, but not being 100%, which would you choose?"
Autonomy IS a defacto State.
This idea has been tried countless times: Annex part or all, but don't kick them out.
Do I think we can today? No. There is no excuse from continuing to talk about what should be.