I agree with Ben Gvir that agreements need to be honored, but Ben Gvir needs a little bit of patience.
As far as I know, the previous Knesset term passed the Norwegian law, at the time, only as a horaat shaa - a temporary measure only for that specific Knesset term. When that Knesset was dissolved, the Norwegian Law went out of effect.
Peretz and Smotritch have been appointed to ministerial positions in a temporary "holding" government as we wait for new elections. This temporary government cannot pass news like, such as a new Norwegian law. This government is in a holding pattern until after elections and the formation of a new government. Ben Gvir is right, but he needs a little bit of patience and has to wait until the Norwegian Law situation becomes relevant again.
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
I thought the Norwegian Law was adopted as a Basic Law but it only allows for one minister per party. The Likud deal was that it would be amended to 2 to get Ben Gvir & Marzel into the Knesset. A caretaker government doesn't have the authority to amend a basic law.
ReplyDeleteWith the Knesset in recess, what responsibilities is Ben Gvir hoping to obtain by becoming an MK? Is he looking for seniority/salary? Is he looking to test the trustworthiness of his political partners? On a theoretical level, even without the amended Norwegian Law, with elections coming, do Peretz and Smortich lose anything by giving up their Knesset seats? Does offering Shaked the #2 slot, is there concern of who she could potentially push out of the Knesset from those lower on the list?