-- Director of Degel Hatorah Yitzchak Puindrus, responding to Shaked's attack on the power given to UTJ to be responsible for the appointment of new dayanim
Pindrus's last statement is meaningless. The issue making different parties want this authority isnt a matter of will the dayanim pasken according to halacha or not - no matter who appoints them they should be paskening according to halacha. The issue is more of approach. Different rabbis have different approaches in halacha and follow different piskei halacha of earlier poskim, some more stringent and some more lenient. Another issue is their being forthcoming and open to the public or being less accessible and open - also a form of approach.
Pindrus's earlier statement is very true, I think. Yamina (and the same in its earlier stages under different names) cannot expect to only deal with issues not specifically relevant to their electorate, but then to automatically also be given the authority relevant to them. if they want to be responsible for religious services and education and other issues close to their hearts, those are the ministries they should have been demanding. Instead they were demanding ministries of higher objective value for their prestige.
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment