That has baffled many people. Shaked, a woman who describers herself as a feminist, praises RBG effusively and talks about how she was a trailblazer and led the way, an paved the way, for so many women, but Shaked would never appoint her to the Israeli Supreme Court. This makes people wonder. It sounds contradictory.
I think one needs to separate Shaked's words. Shaked can admire RBG for the trail she blazed as a woman and all that she accomplished and still disagree with her politics and her legal stances. Shaked is more conservative in how she sees Israeli society, and despite thinking wonderful things of RBG, she can also think that RBG was too liberal for Israeli society.
Being a feminist and working for female advancement does not require one to also be an uber-liberal.
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Shaked is a judicial conservative. Ginsberg was a judicial activist fits right into Israeli SC. Shaked wants to transform Israeli Court to more conservative bent thus she wud not want another flaming liberal on the bench
ReplyDeleteShaked is a judicial conservative. Ginsberg was a judicial activist fits right into Israeli SC. Shaked wants to transform Israeli Court to more conservative bent thus she wud not want another flaming liberal on the bench
ReplyDeleteShaked is a judicial conservative. Ginsberg was a judicial activist fits right into Israeli SC. Shaked wants to transform Israeli Court to more conservative bent thus she wud not want another flaming liberal on the bench
ReplyDelete