The Likud statement says that Former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejects the calls for any sort of term limits, whether it applies to him or not. Parliamentary democracies do not have term limits but leave it up to the public to decide who should lead it in free elections... etc etc
Yes, there is a difference in this between parliamentary governments and presidential governments, but in essence there is no real reason why there must be a difference why term limits is a good idea in one and not in the other.
And to remind you, back in 1997, Netanyahu led the efforts to propose term limits. Netanyahu was doing so as part of his push to move to a presidential system and away from the parliamentary system we had, and still have. Netanyahu said then that a prime minister should not be allowed to serve for more than two terms - with that being enough to accomplish your goals and after that it would be time to move on.
Sure, Netanyahu has the right to change his mind. Especially when it comes to himself. Just as he changed his mind when he said Olmert should resign upon indictment but when it came to himself being indicted he chose not to resign.
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Coming from a parliamentary system, I support no term limits on the PM position but I suppose to placate the anti-Netanyahu crowd that after eight years, perhaps a compromise would be that certain legal responsibilities are passed to a vice-PM which would then start reducing the power of the PM from then on and make it less attractive to stay on, while also passing on the torch.
ReplyDeletethis is an interesting suggestion.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete