A husband and wife were fighting constantly. Clearly a lack of shalom bayis reigned in the house. They later got divorced.

She filed a complaint against him. At trial he admitted to the claims but denied he attacked her (not sure how to differentiate - did he say it was self-defense?)
The judge recently acquitted the husband, saying that because they clearly had a bad marriage and a lot of friction along with fighting over property in the divorce, she cannot accept such testimony simply based on the words of the wife. She has a clear bias and cannot be relied upon.
(source: mynet)
What a waste of good cottage cheese!
No comments:
Post a Comment