Featured Post
Free The Hostages! Bring Them Home!
(this is a featured post and will stay at the top for the foreseeable future.. scroll down for new posts) -------------------------------...
Sep 12, 2021
tweet of the Day
פרופ׳ גליה רהב מסבירה ב #קלמןליברמן שמכיוון שמחלקות טיפול נמרץ מתעדפות טיפול בצעירים על פני מבוגרים התוצאה היא שניתן טיפול משופר לצעירים שלא התחסנו לעומת מבוגרים מחוסנים.
— נדב פרי Nadav Perry (@NadavPerry) September 12, 2021
לא הוגן ולא מוסרי.
מי שלא התחסן מבחירה, צעיר או מבוגר, צריך להידחק לסוף התור.
Translation:
Professor Galia Rahav (a Professor of Infectious Diseases, or something like that, at Sheba Hospital) said on the Kalman Libskind show that the ICU units are giving preferential treatment to young patients over older patients, resulting in young people who chose not to get vaccinated receiving priority treatment over older vaccinated patients. This is not ethical or proper. Somebody who chose to not get vaccinated, whether young or old, should wit at the end of the line.
My instinct is to agree, but I dont know enough about medicine or ethics to make such decisions. And thankfully or hopefully I will probably never be in a position to make such a decision. What do you think?
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Labels:
CoronaVirus,
totd,
vaccinations
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Related Posts
I agree "Somebody who chose to not get vaccinated, whether young or old, should wit at the end of the line"
ReplyDeleteIdeally everyone should be treated equally, however if resources are so stretched that choices need to be made. Vaccinated comes first.
It is probably a halachic question. Do you think somebody who does not smoke should get priority when treated for cancer vs. smokers ?
Deleteif there arent enough lungs, generally a smoker, as far as I know, will be lower on the transplant list. if other resources are in tight supply, I imagine a similar policy is used.
DeleteSee here for e.g.: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217126/
ReplyDelete"In general, patients with good prognoses for recovery have priority over patients with poor prognoses." That may explain what's going on here.
That means that a unvaccinated patient with good prognosis will be left to die ahead of the oposite. It would cause more deaths. All this disgusting triage which demonizes people who chose not to vaccinate is a great way of hiding 2 government errors over Corona:
ReplyDelete1. Why are they not giving Ivermectin early treatment AS WELL as vaccines as early treatment. We have more than enough evidence for Ivermectine now and it costs $1 per day.
2. Government underfunding of the health service was a major problem before Corona and you would think that so many months into Corona the government would fix that. I also don't understand how Israeli field hospitals can be set up so fast in foreign countries and yet the government has not yet opened up extra ICU beds in hospitals here.
Because Ivermectin, unless you are a horse that needs to be dewormed, has no serious evidence that it works at all, why don't you take Zinc and HCQ or that fake treatment was discarded last year, I can't keep up...
Delete