Featured Post
Free The Hostages! Bring Them Home!
(this is a featured post and will stay at the top for the foreseeable future.. scroll down for new posts) -------------------------------...
Jan 6, 2016
newly appointed non-haredi upsets haredim
UTJ MKs are upset about the appointment of the new director of the Haredi division in the Ministry of Education.
The UTJ MKs were pressuring Bennet to appoint someone to their liking, specifically a Haredi person or someone close to the Haredi community. In the end Bennet appointed someone secular with no connections (though it seems he is not considered anti-haredi) to head this Haredi-education division.
Without getting into the discussion about the person himself - is he qualified or not, is there someone better or not, is he someone's cousin or not - because I don't know or care about that, I want to comment on the opposition to his appointment.
An unnamed "head of Haredi educational institutions" compared it to appointing a department head of a hospital someone who is not a doctor.
As someone sent to me, the director of Maayanei Hayeshua hospital in Bnei Braq is, I am sure, a fine man, maybe a great administrator and director, and not a doctor (in his title they call him rav, in the description they call him Mr.). I am not going to say his only qualification is that he is Haredi, as I am sure he is highly qualified for the job, but I am sure it helped and the fact that he isn't a doctor was not a hindrance.
Besides for that, we see throughout society that Haredim take jobs and positions that serve non-haredim, and vice versa. As long as this new appointee is qualified and a good director with strong administrative capabilities, I see no reason why being Haredi must be a requirement of the job.
The UTJ MKs were pressuring Bennet to appoint someone to their liking, specifically a Haredi person or someone close to the Haredi community. In the end Bennet appointed someone secular with no connections (though it seems he is not considered anti-haredi) to head this Haredi-education division.
Without getting into the discussion about the person himself - is he qualified or not, is there someone better or not, is he someone's cousin or not - because I don't know or care about that, I want to comment on the opposition to his appointment.
An unnamed "head of Haredi educational institutions" compared it to appointing a department head of a hospital someone who is not a doctor.
As someone sent to me, the director of Maayanei Hayeshua hospital in Bnei Braq is, I am sure, a fine man, maybe a great administrator and director, and not a doctor (in his title they call him rav, in the description they call him Mr.). I am not going to say his only qualification is that he is Haredi, as I am sure he is highly qualified for the job, but I am sure it helped and the fact that he isn't a doctor was not a hindrance.
Besides for that, we see throughout society that Haredim take jobs and positions that serve non-haredim, and vice versa. As long as this new appointee is qualified and a good director with strong administrative capabilities, I see no reason why being Haredi must be a requirement of the job.
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The first guy interviewed on Kol bRama last night actually had a surprising spin and said it is for the better that he is not one of us because he does not have to do proteksia for anyone, his uncle, his cousin, or someone from his synagogue. Switching to Kol Chai got the typical one-dimensional conventional thinking. BUT, the impression I got from the MKs who were putting on a show to whine, that Bennet did not discuss the position at all when all of them met him last week. I am so sure that they gave him permission to get someone previously uninvolved. Hopefully, the system will get more professional now.
ReplyDeleteThere is a difference between a head of a department (clinical) in a hospital and the head or director of a hospital. The director of a hospital is fairly often not a doctor. But it is unheard of for a head of a department such as surgery, medicine, etc. not to be a doctor.
ReplyDeleteHaredim bring an example too close to home - what about a minister of health with no prior medical experience?
ReplyDelete