Even including streets and other public areas, 1.7 dunams per family (1700 sqm) wasn't enough?

I guess not. they werent building large apartment buildings, and while the houses there are not large, they also have courtyards..

Just curious what the source of this story is. I think you have to treat stories like this with a healthy dose of skepticism, just like tznius stories. Too many agendas involved.

Assuming it's true, great story.

Unfortunately, VERY few in the gov't or for that matter, rabbis who receive there salaries from the gov't, who actually give a rat's tuchus about halakhah.

Sad, but true.

If they did, then I assure we'd still be in Azza, the Sinai, and they would be a lot less Arabs (and Christians) residing in Israel.

the Ladaat article mentions the name of the person who told the story. I dont know if this is a "well known" story or something he told over that was not previously known, or where he got it from.

I think people should be worried, in today's climate, that somebody might read the story and create a political crisis demanding the demolition or relocation of Mea Shearim due to it being built on stolen property

Um, so are we saying that Arabs do not have the right to purchase land in Israel and that stealing from them, especially if done covertly, is okay?
And then there's the irony - one group of Israeli-flag burning folks buy the land from another group.

1. Looks pretty clear to me that no, we most certainly do not:

משנה תורה הלכות עבודה זרה פרק י,ד [ג] אין מוכרין להם בתים ושדות, בארץ ישראל

2. Please remember that the Torah is not politically-correct nor automatically in line with Western values, sensibilities and laws.

3. Using Ironheart's suggested logic, we should give back North Tel-Aviv (God forbid). ;-)

4. Stealing? (sigh) Please see no. 2 above.

I'm with MGI. This mentality doesn't make for a very healthy society. It's similar rationalizations that many so-called "frum" folks use to evade taxes.

Menachem, Do you follow halakha? I am far from perfect, but I do my best to. That's my mentality. Western mentality is irrelevant to my life, unless I am interested 1) What the goyim are up to, or 2) How to help my fellow Jews get out of galuth, both physically and spiritually.

Esser Agaroth, let's consider the following:
1) You must distinguish between national and personal ownership of land. Yes, all the land belongs to the Jewish people and private Jewish landowners should not sell to Gentiles but in this case we are dealing with an Arab who bought the land from someone, probably not a Jew. Now Jews come along and engage in a personal transaction with him. Yes, from a national point of view we can say to the Arab "You never should have had ownership in the first place!" but from a private point of view he had a title and deed issued by the authorities of the day and from his perspective these folks are, on a personal level since they are not the agents of the halachic state of Israel, stealing from him. There is no kiddush HaShem in this no matter how nationalistic one might be.

Rafi, let me get this straight... the biggest problem with this is that someone might have a claim to relocate mea sheariim?

seems like most every post is in agreement that theft is not theft if your god tells you so.

yay!

Given my past actions it turns out I'm charedi.

halacha says it is forbidden to steal from a non-Jew.

question is who owns th land. If a Jew owned it, and the non-Jew just took it, it is stolen by the non-Jew, so a Jew can take it back. That is how I understand what Rav Sonnenfeld was saying. I have no idea if historically that is correct or not - maybe throughout the years and centuries the non-Jews had bought the land.

Two questions for Esser Agaroth:

1. What the Me'ah She'arim people did in this story is the simple pshat of hasagat gvul:
לֹא תַסִּיג גְּבוּל רֵעֲךָ אֲשֶׁר גָּבְלוּ רִאשֹׁנִים בְּנַחֲלָתְךָ אֲשֶׁר תִּנְחַל בָּאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לְךָ לְרִשְׁתָּהּ. Basically, the passuk is about moving a fence to increase you lot size.

2. What are we to make of the gemarah in Gittin 8b, allowing certain actions on Shabbat to aid in buying land in Israel from non-Jews? Why the need to pay for it at all, if it is all "ours" already?

You can add whatever you want to his comment: but he didn't say or imply any of that. Did he do even a lick of research or imply that he had any knowledge of the issue?
nope.
He was asked if stealing land from an Arab was ok and he said, yes. That's the story.

Which is fine by me. Don't get me wrong. I am not knocking this rabbi at all: I redeem things all the time.

I was simply taken aback by the story and by the acceptance and admiration of the story by supposedly religious folk.

read again "we are not stealing the land, but we are redeeming it. We paid the Arab, but that is because we are in exile and have no choice. But the land is not his!"

the land is ours, and when we have to pay for it, so be it. but when we can get it back without paying for it, it is ours and it is not theft.
it might be a justification, it might have been his real opinion. I know not.

Shmilda, Re'eh is not a non-Jew. I believe that the suggiyah you point out is related to when we are in a position when we may only acquire land in Eretz Yisrael through purchase (like when goyim are in control, even when Avraham, Ya'aqov, and David purchased land). When we are in (theoretical?) control of the land/milhemeth misswah/milhemeth reshuth, then a different paradigm applies. BTW, interestingly enough, the qinyan (but not the final purchase) was made on Shabbath to (re)acquire Me'ah She'arim.

Rafi pointed out correctly that גזל לגויים איסור חמור, but who says it's theirs in the first place. The same was pointed out with the original "controversy" (שנת שמיטה תשס"א) over which olives may be picked in the Shomron and Yehudah. Where are the documents that say that the trees (or land) belongs to them in the first place?

MGI, Um,...where are your sources? I see your logic, but you're not backing it up with sources, thus I can only assume that you are throwing around QHaShem, due to how you personally feel about the matter. Pissing the goyim off is not alway a Hillul HaShem.

1. Maybe the Arab should be compensated, as in the U. S. gov't's right to eminent domain (a western concept, that perhaps you can relate to). 2. OTOH, some Rabbanim hold that we are indeed in a milhemeth misswah, and thus we are entitled to conquering all of Yehudah and Shomron, and may take booty to boot (no pun intended).

The following information about the history of Meah Shearim cast serious doubt on the veracity of the story. It is important to remember that the original neighborhood of Meah Shearim was very small.

1. A total of 32.5 dunam was bought, apparently, although there is no solid proof, from residents of Liftah.
2. The land was purchased in three installments and building began in 1874.
3. Rabbi Sonnenfled first arrived in Palestine in 1873.
4. Rabbi Sonnenfeld was involved with the building of the Batei Ungarin in 1891.
5. There was very active non-Jewish participation, both Arab and Anglo-Protestant, of the planning and building of Meah Shearim, so if it wasn't for non-Jews Meah Shearim probably wouldn't exist.

If I have more time later, I'll see what I can find.

I looked in Amnon Cohen's book on Jews in Muslim Courts in the 19th c. (in Hebrew) and he has all the goods about the purchase of the land on which Meah Shearim was built. Between 1874-6 a total of eight purchases were made from dozens of residents of Lifta for the original land of Meah Shearim and some surrounding plots. There is even a document of a Jew selling some of the land in the area to an Arab. If Jews thought that it was OK to steal land from Arabs they didn't do a very good job.

thank you Michael

so did the story happen or not?

was it ok to redeem meah sheariim from arabs, and thus also ok to redeem ulpana or not?

Because that's the real question here: not what is legal based on a standard of justice and equality, but can we get what we want regardless of the expense to others and feel good about it too because we do it in the name of god.

I think people are missing out on a very important fact. The land of Israel can only be purchased 70 years at a time. After 70 years, the land goes back to the ownership of the tribes.

You should read the passages in Yirmiahu about him redeeming his family's land as Jerusalem is being Conquered.

Anon... the native americans felt something similar... good luck with that.

anon, yes, Israel has had good luck with most of the land, no argument, I thought we were talking about ulpana vis a vie mea sheariim.

I have no problem with stealing cheating and exploiting to get the land, or more land... But I am happy to admit that I think most people have no problem with that in most facets of life. I don't see why we need to couch our behavior in religiosity. Have the self-awareness and conviction of your desires to do what you do without pretending that you serve a higher purpose.

anon, yes, Israel has had good luck with most of the land, no argument, I thought we were talking about ulpana vis a vie mea sheariim.

I have no problem with stealing cheating and exploiting to get the land, or more land... But I am happy to admit that I think most people have no problem with that in most facets of life. I don't see why we need to couch our behavior in religiosity. Have the self-awareness and conviction of your desires to do what you do without pretending that you serve a higher purpose.

well so do I. But with my set of standards and yours, it's not called cheating and exploiting. We can call it obeying god's law over man's... or in my case, what I want is more important than man's law for a different reason than why what you want is more important than man's law.

so if I have to steal or cheat to get what I want, I don't need to call it that. I am simply devout in my desires.

The way, you are trolling.

Who's laws are more important. The Britsh laws, the ottoman laws, the Israel laws, the Talmud's laws, the Muslim laws, the PA laws?

You have 5 or 6 competing law systems when it comes to land purchasing and rights in Israel.

exactly anon... everyone has laws so all laws are equal and the same and we should get to pick and choose which to adhere to and when. This way, it's not cheating or exploiting, it's I'm adhering to talmudic law... if that doesn't fit, than I'm adhering to natural law, if that doesn't fit , than I'm adhering to modern Israeli law.

After all, why should one adhere to the law of the land at a given time when there are so many other forms of law available?

We see this all the time when orthodox people/groups/rabbis, insist on using a beit din until they turn to a civl court for redress... or what some may call stealing under some godless secular law we can call redeeming under god's law. Which God you may ask? Well, just like their are lots of legal systems to choose from there are loads of theocratic systems to choose from.

or as Sai Baba said (the yogi whose influence coined the expression saibaba) I am God and you are also god. The difference is, I am aware that I am god while you may not yet have had that realization.

if the beis din is recognized by the State, what is wrong with using a beis din? the legal status of the beis din is almost always that of arbitration, and pretty much anybody can be an arbitrator if it is agreeable to both sides in a dispute.

The Way,... What the hell are you talking about?
Do you even know the legal status of things in Israel or do you just like talking out of your ass?

Some people bought property from the ottomans, some from the British, some from Israel. At the same time, the Jewish people were fighting against the Ottomans, and the British to establish a renewed Jewish country based on our claim that Israel was forcefully and illegally taken away from us by the Romans, Greeks, Persians or Babylonians depending on the year. The whole question of land ownership, is a debate about which legal system is in affect in Israel.

You clearly have no clue what's going on.

Rafi - not talking about leglity of beit din per se, rather the attitude of saying that one should use one system and then switching when the switching is good. You've posted such articles on this blog.

Anon, we don't have to go back all 2000 years. And while there may be much debate about various plots of lands, in some cases, the legal aspects of the case are not in dispute and the debate is, should we redeem this land or not. The Ulpana case is one such example. So perhaps I have a bit of a clue.