Showing posts with label Iraq war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iraq war. Show all posts
Jan 5, 2010
you can sue for anything nowadays
wow - you really can sue for anything nowadays.
We bombed the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq in 1981 because they were developing nuclear weapons with which to attack us, Israel, and perhaps other Western countries. The UN resolution allows them to sue for compensation and now they are planning a suit against Israel.
We bombed the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq in 1981 because they were developing nuclear weapons with which to attack us, Israel, and perhaps other Western countries. The UN resolution allows them to sue for compensation and now they are planning a suit against Israel.
Feb 19, 2009
Headline of the Day (hotd)
16:16 Iraqi says he threw shoes at Bush to protest war (AP)
funny that he is protesting the war - the only reason he was able to get away with throwing a shoe at a world leader and not get himself shot by a firing squad as a result, is because George Bush went to war with the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein and installed a democratic style of government.
I guess he prefers the days when he would have been shot for such an action.
funny that he is protesting the war - the only reason he was able to get away with throwing a shoe at a world leader and not get himself shot by a firing squad as a result, is because George Bush went to war with the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein and installed a democratic style of government.
I guess he prefers the days when he would have been shot for such an action.
Apr 1, 2008
Stephen Colbert on the Cubs and Iraq (video)
And then of course there is Stephen Colbert comparing the Chicago Cubs futility to Iraq...
Jun 20, 2007
a Halitza story
For those of you who do not know, "Halitzah" is a mitzva in the Torah. In brief, when a married man dies, leaving a wife but no children, that man's brother (if he has at least one), is commanded by the Torah to perform a marital ceremony called "Yibum" with his brother's widow.
The idea of this is to establish the dead brother's name in Israel by producing children.
If, for whatever reason, the brother cannot or chooses not to do so, of if the widow refuses to marry him, the Torah changes the mitzva to one of Halitza. That is a separation ceremony in which certain verses are read from the Torah, the woman spits into a shoe, and they are offically separated and each can go on living their lives as they wish.
Nowadays, we do not perform the mitzva of Yibum. Whenever such a situation arises, we perform halitza instead of yibum. I understand the reason to be that the Rabbis decided (even in the time of the Talmud this decision was beginning - it is not a decree of today's Rabbis) that our thoughts are less than pure. It was suspected that when the brother was performing Yibum, he might have thoughts of desire for his sister-in-law, ratehr than thoughts of establishing his dead brothers name.
Because of this, they decided that we would no longer perform Yibum, but only halitza.
Enough of an introduction.
It seems that halitza is not a very common occurence. Whenever I have heard of one taking place it is always "after the fact" and having been done with a sense of urgency and even excitement. Usually one hears that "The Rabbi called me about a halitza going to take place and invited me to come watch."
An emotional halitza took place this week in Jerusalem.
One year ago a woman lost her husband in the Second Lebanon War. They had no children. She was obligated to have the halita ceremony performed in order for her to begin to move on and look for a new husband.
Her family members had tried to press her to partake in the halitza ceremony so she could move on. She refused, saying that her husband is still with her. To her he was still alive.
Eventually the family turned to the Chief Rabbi of Israel, Rabbi Amar, to help with the situation.
The Rabbi tried to convince her to do the halitza. He explained that as long as she continued to refuse, her husband's soul could not rest peacefully. Aside from doing it for herself, she was urged to do it for her dead husband's sake.
He promised her that he would personally deal with the halitza. At the ceremony would also be a memorial service for her dead husband, and eventually she agreed.
After all the preparations were made, the ceremony was performed in the offices of the Chief Rabbi of Israel, one year to the day of the death of her husband, who died in the Second Lebanon War. May his memory be blessed, and may she have the strength and conviction to move on and begin her life anew.
And if anybody knows how I could arrange to witness such a ceremony, please drop me a line.
The idea of this is to establish the dead brother's name in Israel by producing children.
If, for whatever reason, the brother cannot or chooses not to do so, of if the widow refuses to marry him, the Torah changes the mitzva to one of Halitza. That is a separation ceremony in which certain verses are read from the Torah, the woman spits into a shoe, and they are offically separated and each can go on living their lives as they wish.
Nowadays, we do not perform the mitzva of Yibum. Whenever such a situation arises, we perform halitza instead of yibum. I understand the reason to be that the Rabbis decided (even in the time of the Talmud this decision was beginning - it is not a decree of today's Rabbis) that our thoughts are less than pure. It was suspected that when the brother was performing Yibum, he might have thoughts of desire for his sister-in-law, ratehr than thoughts of establishing his dead brothers name.
Because of this, they decided that we would no longer perform Yibum, but only halitza.
Enough of an introduction.
It seems that halitza is not a very common occurence. Whenever I have heard of one taking place it is always "after the fact" and having been done with a sense of urgency and even excitement. Usually one hears that "The Rabbi called me about a halitza going to take place and invited me to come watch."
An emotional halitza took place this week in Jerusalem.
One year ago a woman lost her husband in the Second Lebanon War. They had no children. She was obligated to have the halita ceremony performed in order for her to begin to move on and look for a new husband.
Her family members had tried to press her to partake in the halitza ceremony so she could move on. She refused, saying that her husband is still with her. To her he was still alive.
Eventually the family turned to the Chief Rabbi of Israel, Rabbi Amar, to help with the situation.
The Rabbi tried to convince her to do the halitza. He explained that as long as she continued to refuse, her husband's soul could not rest peacefully. Aside from doing it for herself, she was urged to do it for her dead husband's sake.
He promised her that he would personally deal with the halitza. At the ceremony would also be a memorial service for her dead husband, and eventually she agreed.
After all the preparations were made, the ceremony was performed in the offices of the Chief Rabbi of Israel, one year to the day of the death of her husband, who died in the Second Lebanon War. May his memory be blessed, and may she have the strength and conviction to move on and begin her life anew.
And if anybody knows how I could arrange to witness such a ceremony, please drop me a line.
Feb 27, 2007
support soldiers (video)
Even if you do not support the war in Iraq, it is not the soldiers who are at fault. It is the politicians. The soldiers deserve the full support of the American people.
And here is the story of someone who tries to make sure the soldiers feel supported...
And here is the story of someone who tries to make sure the soldiers feel supported...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)