Showing posts with label gedolim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gedolim. Show all posts
Apr 23, 2026
Picture of the Day
this picture is actually form a couple days ago but being Yom Hazikaron then (at least when I saw it posted online) I did not want to post it until after the Israeli holidays....
That is Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch, one of the Haredi gedolim today and Rosh Yeshiva of Slabodka Yeshiva in Bnei Braq, autographing a baseball in a donor's home (parlor meeting I guess) in Chicago... shortly after this he flew back to Israel...
Being that he was born in the USA (NY) and lived there for almost 30 years before moving to Israel, I wonder if he has fond memories of baseball (as Rav Scheinberg famously did) and if he was a fan of any team when he was younger....
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Jun 4, 2023
Interesting Psak: Rav Landau's status
Kikar is reporting on an interesting psak issued by Rav Bentzion Kook, Rosh Beis Horaah in Jerusalem and rav in Petach Tikva.
Rav Kook was asked about the status of Rav Dov Landau, one of the candidates to be the next gadol hador now that Rav Edelstein has passed. The question was posed because Rav Landau just left on a trip to the USA for a chizuk campaign visiting different communities, and the question posed was how to relate to him upon arrival at each location. The question asked was if upon seeing Rav Landau one should state the bracha "שחלק לחכמתו ליראיו" - a bracha which is said upon seeing a great talmid chochom.
Rav Kook responded with some uncertainty saying surely Rav Landau is great enough for the bracha to be said about him. However, Rav Kook said when he himself went for an audience with Rav Landau he did not say the bracha because when people would say it about Rav Elyashiv and he was aware of it, he would immediately tell them to qualify it with a "baruch kvod shem malchuto l'olam va'ed". Basically, if Rav Elyashiv thought he himself wasnt worthy of it 100%, maybe Rav Landau isnt either.
I wonder though, why is this question only relevant now that Rav Landau might be the replacement for Rav Edelstein as gadol hador and the person the politicians ask their questions to? If he was a great talmid chochom yesterday and nobody said it for him, what changed today? And if he is great enough today for it to be said about him, why wasnt it said yesterday? Can the bracha only be said for one person in the generation, and now that Rav Edelstein passed that mantle goes to Rav Landau? Can it not be said about any other great talmid chochom?
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Feb 21, 2021
we just do what we want
There were several articles in the news last week about the various rabbonim who said the yeshivas should not send out, or allow, the boys to go collecting this year for Purim as they do every year, but it should all be done by telephone this year.
Just last night, the beginning of the Purim collecting season, we had 3 different groups of yeshiva boys knock on our door, collecting for their yeshivas "tatim".
Personally I was not giving them enough money to justify tcheppering them with questions as to why they are not listening to the gedolim that said not to go around collecting. I just gave them each a small amount and sent them on their ways.
But they, or at least some, are not listening.
Nothing new. I believe that most of us listen or follow the rules, social, societal, communal, legal, when it is convenient and when not, not. Higher callings and ideology - that is just something we pass the buck on. It is easy to say I am just following orders, this is what the gedolim say, passing responsibility to others. We all, for the most part, just do what we want.
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Dec 23, 2020
picture of the Chafetz Chaim discovered
Remember when the old video clip of an Agudath Israel conference in Europe came to light a few years ago and gave us a rare glimpse of gedolim from previous generations, specifically the rarely seen Chafetz Chaim? That video immediately went viral. People were drawn to it.
Now a never before seen photograph of the Chaftez Chaim, Rav Yisrael Meir Hakohen Kagan, just came to light.
Earlier this week, Rav Dan Schlesinger published a special booklet, with the picture, with stories about the Chofetz Chaim, including the story of his planned trip to settle in Eretz Yisrael, which has never been published before.
Rav Schlesinger discovered the anecdotes about the Chofetz Chaim when he received an inheritance which included documents and banknotes that the Chofetz Chaim sent to a Yerushalmi Jew named Rav Yosef Levi Chagiz. Rav Chagiz had sent 100 liras to the Chofetz Chaim in Radin to finance his trip to Eretz Yisrael. The trip never came to fruition and the Chofetz Chaim sent the money back to Rav Chagiz with a shaliach.
Among the documents was the rare photo of the Chofetz Chaim. There are very few existing pictures of the revered Gadol, especially a relatively close-up photo such as this one. The Chofetz Chaim is seen sitting at a table with two other Jews but as of now their identities are unknown.
Rav Schlesinger discovered the anecdotes about the Chofetz Chaim when he received an inheritance which included documents and banknotes that the Chofetz Chaim sent to a Yerushalmi Jew named Rav Yosef Levi Chagiz. Rav Chagiz had sent 100 liras to the Chofetz Chaim in Radin to finance his trip to Eretz Yisrael. The trip never came to fruition and the Chofetz Chaim sent the money back to Rav Chagiz with a shaliach.
Among the documents was the rare photo of the Chofetz Chaim. There are very few existing pictures of the revered Gadol, especially a relatively close-up photo such as this one. The Chofetz Chaim is seen sitting at a table with two other Jews but as of now their identities are unknown.
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Labels:
gedolim
Oct 21, 2018
Is Haredi (Litvishe) rabbinic leadership passe?
According to an article on Actualic, Degel activists are not happy with the decision to support Moshe Lion for mayor in Jerusalem rather than Yossi Deutsch. Earlier Degel leader Rav Baruch Soloveitchil was also quoted as saying he does not understand the decision to support Lion rather than Deutsch but that's what the rabbonim decided... now the activists are upset, calling it political suicide. They are murmuring and even saying that Lion and Berkovitch will likely make it to the second round of voting and they suspect the Chassidic groups will support Berkovitch in the second round as revenge for Degel not supporting Deutsch. The activists basically feel that supporting Lion is a flawed decision that has no chance of success.
None of us are prophets and nobody really knows what will happen next week. The most anybody can do is guess and make assumptions based on what they think will happen and based on the numbers they believe in.
What will or will not happen is not the point here, as I do not peddle in prophecy. I am neither a prophet nor the son of a prophet.
My point is that I find it interesting that the party activists are openly upset and talking against the decision made by the political leadership upon consultation with the rabbonim. I do not remember any such behavior in past elections, even when some decisions were potentially questionable. I think it points to the leadership void since the deaths of Rav Elyashiv and Rav Shteinman. And maybe also the move away from taking everything the rabbonim say as the final word and "torah misinai"
None of us are prophets and nobody really knows what will happen next week. The most anybody can do is guess and make assumptions based on what they think will happen and based on the numbers they believe in.
What will or will not happen is not the point here, as I do not peddle in prophecy. I am neither a prophet nor the son of a prophet.
My point is that I find it interesting that the party activists are openly upset and talking against the decision made by the political leadership upon consultation with the rabbonim. I do not remember any such behavior in past elections, even when some decisions were potentially questionable. I think it points to the leadership void since the deaths of Rav Elyashiv and Rav Shteinman. And maybe also the move away from taking everything the rabbonim say as the final word and "torah misinai"
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Mar 11, 2018
YWN opposes the gedolim
The following letter is being sent around Lakewood, by a group calling themselves the Vaccine Choice Coalition, promoting their anti-vaccine agenda and looking to pressure local school sto have to accept non-vaccinated children.
That being said, my purpose in bringing this is not to debate the vaccinate/anti-vaxx issue and say they are right or wrong. My point is actually something else entirely.
In YWN they published an article from Yair Hoffman in which he writes very strongly against this group and the movement in general. He even references Lakewood as being founded by the Kotlers and Rebbetzin Rishla Kotler had been someone who funded vaccinations for those who could not afford them. Hoffman goes on a long diatribe against this phenomenon and against this group. Definitely worthy of a read, if you are interested in the topic.
This article by Hoffman is what I find interesting.
Hoffman writes the article without mentioning the rabbinic support behind it. It is even more ironic that he opposes the group referencing Rebbetzin Kotler, without even mentioning the irony, or even just the fact, that Rav Malkiel Kotler is one of the people behind it. Hoffman writes the article as if it is just a bunch of ignorant baalebatim doing this.
Further, YWN, via Yair Hoffman, has published an article, on a controversial topic, that opposes what a group of rabbonim, including one of the gedolim of the USA, are trying to do. Since when does YWN go against the rabbonim/gedolim? Does their opinion count, does Yair Hoffman's opinion count, against that of Rav Malkiel Kotler and the others? Since when is that their approach? Perhaps not mentioning the rabbonim behind it was to temper this suggestion, as if they are not opposing the gedolim but only mistaken baalebatim, but that is not the case.
I find this idea fascinating, that they are willing to oppose gedolim, even if hiding it, because they disagree strongly with that opinion. To me this is more interesting than the vaxx debate
Dear Friends, B’siyata D’shmaya we have formed The Vaccine Coalition, a Coalition of Non-Vaccinating Parents in Lakewood, New Jersey.Rabbis can have personal opinions just like anybody else, but they should not use their rabbinic authority in matters that have nothing to do with issues they have no expertise in and are simply their opinions.
This coalition was founded by R’ Malkiel Kotler shlit”a, R’ Shmuel Meir Katz shlit”a and R’ Refael Szmerla shlit”a, and it aims to address the current pressing issue of schools rejecting or dismissing non-vaccinated children. It will also be available to help non-vaccinating parents in Lakewood in any area we feel we can, as well as to provide support of ‘strength in numbers’ to pro-vaccine choice Lakewood families.
This coalition depends on a collective voice and will not be launched until we reach a minimum of 250 families. If you live in Lakewood and have made a decision not to vaccinate your children, we encourage you to please take a few moments to sign up to join the coalition, for your benefit, and for the benefit of all other Lakewood families like yourselves.
By joining the coalition you agree to have your name and personal information added to our private database. Your information will never be released to a third party without your permission. If the coalition should find it absolutely necessary to release your name in the course of assisting it's members you may receive an email requesting your permission. Any such instance will be authorized by the Rosh Hayeshiva R’ Malkiel Kotler shlit”a beforehand.
The success of this endeavor is contingent on enlisting as many non-vaccinating families as possible. Please take the time to reach out to your friends and family who don’t vaccinate and encourage them to join.
To join, please visit www.vaccinecoalition.org. Alternatively you can join by emailing vaccinecoalition@gmail.com or call/ text 732-806-7739
That being said, my purpose in bringing this is not to debate the vaccinate/anti-vaxx issue and say they are right or wrong. My point is actually something else entirely.
In YWN they published an article from Yair Hoffman in which he writes very strongly against this group and the movement in general. He even references Lakewood as being founded by the Kotlers and Rebbetzin Rishla Kotler had been someone who funded vaccinations for those who could not afford them. Hoffman goes on a long diatribe against this phenomenon and against this group. Definitely worthy of a read, if you are interested in the topic.
This article by Hoffman is what I find interesting.
Hoffman writes the article without mentioning the rabbinic support behind it. It is even more ironic that he opposes the group referencing Rebbetzin Kotler, without even mentioning the irony, or even just the fact, that Rav Malkiel Kotler is one of the people behind it. Hoffman writes the article as if it is just a bunch of ignorant baalebatim doing this.
Further, YWN, via Yair Hoffman, has published an article, on a controversial topic, that opposes what a group of rabbonim, including one of the gedolim of the USA, are trying to do. Since when does YWN go against the rabbonim/gedolim? Does their opinion count, does Yair Hoffman's opinion count, against that of Rav Malkiel Kotler and the others? Since when is that their approach? Perhaps not mentioning the rabbonim behind it was to temper this suggestion, as if they are not opposing the gedolim but only mistaken baalebatim, but that is not the case.
I find this idea fascinating, that they are willing to oppose gedolim, even if hiding it, because they disagree strongly with that opinion. To me this is more interesting than the vaxx debate
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Labels:
gedolim,
vaccinations
Feb 20, 2017
when a cultural difference says you can ignore psak
the gedolim of Eretz Yisrael have come out many times with statements that concerts and the like are prohibited, even with separate seating and even if the event is only for men.
Kikar reports about a "dinner" on behalf of the Gerrer institutions of Eretz Yisrael set to take place in the USA next week with the main attraction being a performance by Mordechai Ben David, along with some other performers.
Now, they could have explained it away saying that the Gerrer Rebbe never signed on any ban or prohibition but that would not be true as he did sign on such a ban a number of years ago...
So, with the Gerrer Rebbe against such performances (arvei Shira and the like), why is it ok for the Gur institutions to hold such an event with such a performance?
The answer given by the relevant askanim is that the culture in the USA is different so it is ok (even though it is on behalf of the Israeli institutions.
Sounds good to me. Whenever there is a self-defined cultural difference we are now able to ignore the psak of the gedolim and even our own rebbe... many people have said similarly in the past - that a given psak isn't relevant because of x, y or z differences - but now the response has the hechsher of one of the gedolim saying my psak can be ignored for those reasons.
Kikar reports about a "dinner" on behalf of the Gerrer institutions of Eretz Yisrael set to take place in the USA next week with the main attraction being a performance by Mordechai Ben David, along with some other performers.
Now, they could have explained it away saying that the Gerrer Rebbe never signed on any ban or prohibition but that would not be true as he did sign on such a ban a number of years ago...
So, with the Gerrer Rebbe against such performances (arvei Shira and the like), why is it ok for the Gur institutions to hold such an event with such a performance?
The answer given by the relevant askanim is that the culture in the USA is different so it is ok (even though it is on behalf of the Israeli institutions.
Sounds good to me. Whenever there is a self-defined cultural difference we are now able to ignore the psak of the gedolim and even our own rebbe... many people have said similarly in the past - that a given psak isn't relevant because of x, y or z differences - but now the response has the hechsher of one of the gedolim saying my psak can be ignored for those reasons.
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Labels:
culture,
gedolim,
Gerrer Rebbe,
MBD
Feb 2, 2016
Tweet of the Day
from a Haredi journalist..
is it a joke or not? I don't know, though it does not sound like it.
I do know that you would never see an Israeli rosh yeshiva or gadol going skiing....
התפללו לרפואת הגאון רבי אריה מלכיאל בן רישל, ראש ישיבת לייקווד שהחליק במהלך סקי בשווייץ ונפצע קלות. לרפואה שלמה בתוך שאר חולי ישראל.— אברהם גרינצייג (@avigrin10) February 1, 2016
is it a joke or not? I don't know, though it does not sound like it.
I do know that you would never see an Israeli rosh yeshiva or gadol going skiing....
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Jul 20, 2015
and Rav Shteinman takes first place!
For the first time ever, supposedly, a survey was conducted to determine the most popular leaders in the Haredi community.
According to Bechadrei, the survey checked who is the Haredi leader that most people in the Haredi community follow his rulings.
Not surprisingly, Rav Shteinman came out on top pulling in 33% support and adherence.
Second place was taken by an additional 33% saying their "admor", so the hassidic rebbes all together would take second place.
Third place was taken by Rav Shalom Cohen with 7.6%.
The remainder was split among Rav Shmuel Auerbach, Rav Weiss of the Eida, Rav Mazuz, and "other" taking the bulk of the remainder.
I am surprised that Rav Cohen only pulled in 7.6%. Considering that he is the maran of Shas and its followers, that seems like an awfully low number.
What bothered me about this survey is its existence. While interesting, it makes it seem like the rav you follow is part of a popularity contest.
And like all surveys, the results are likely skewed to the tune of whomever it was that commissioned it for whatever purpose he had in mind...
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Apr 12, 2015
Rav Wosner's private moment
I don't know much about the private life of Rav Shmuel Wosner, zt"l, who died at the beginning of Pesach, but I regularly used his sefer, Shevet HaLevi, as a resource when I was learning for smicha.
The following picture, of a private moment, of Rav Wosner sitting on a bench with his [second] wife, is especially touching... much can be seen in it.
The picture is being sent around, and I do not know the source of it..
The following picture, of a private moment, of Rav Wosner sitting on a bench with his [second] wife, is especially touching... much can be seen in it.
The picture is being sent around, and I do not know the source of it..
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Labels:
gedolim
Sep 3, 2012
Rav Nosson Kaminetsky With All The Juicy Stories (video)
Rav Nosson Kaminetsky With All The Juicy Stories
Rav Kaminetsky, author of Making of a Godol, was on the panel of a program called "Leil Shishi Actually", and he has got great stories... the interview is in Hebrew...
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Rav Kaminetsky, author of Making of a Godol, was on the panel of a program called "Leil Shishi Actually", and he has got great stories... the interview is in Hebrew...
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Jun 13, 2012
Petition For The Yated Against The Gedolim
I have not really been paying close attention to the details of the hostile takeover of the Yated Neeman (Israeli edition) or the fighting that has been going on over there. It is one irrelevant (to me) group fighting with another irrelevant group (to me) about control of an irrelevant (to me) newspaper.
I did find this tidbit interesting. The following release went out over the PR Newswire:
Petition Against New York ultra-Orthodox Billionaire Shimon Glick - Thousands of Yeshiva Students in Israel & the US Sign Petition Calling on Glick to Withdraw Intention to Take over 'Yated Ne'eman'
TEL-AVIV, Israel, June 12, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --A petition is currently being circulated in the ultra-Orthodox street calling on New York ultra-Orthodox billionaire Shimon Glick to withdraw from his attempt to take over the 'Yated Ne'eman' newspaper by removing the Rabbi Eliashiv trustees from positions of influence in the newspaper. Tens of thousands of Yeshiva students in Israel and in the US have already signed the petition and many thousands more are expected to sign in the next few days. Sources close to 'Yated Ne'eman' stated that this is a dangerous attempt to hurt the Lithuanian stream of the 'Degel HaTorah' Party and weaken the power of this significant body by disconnecting it from the glorious rabbinical legacy of Rabbi Shach, and therefore it must be uprooted. It was also reported that the moves taken by Glick harm Rabbi Shach's enterprise and threatens rabbis and intellectuals closely associated with "Yated Ne'eman" and its supporters.Rav Shach is long gone, Rav Shach appointed Rav Shteinman as a successor (supposedly) and according to the profile I read in the Mishpacha last week, Shimon Glick was a close talmid of Rav Shach. So, while I have no idea who is playing in who's court, the petition sounds kind of silly. I am sure people are more worried about their jobs than about this or that legacy.
I guess this fight means that one need not listen to Rav Chaim Kanievsky (who wrote a letter in this week's Yated supporting Rav Shteinman saying that Rav Elyashiv is sick and Rav Shteinman has taken over leadership of the generation) or Rav Shteinman or the various other rabbonim involved. I'll remember that when they start quoting those names about what they want me to do. Selective daas torah...
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
May 13, 2012
The Unity Of The Internet Asifa
The "asifa" regarding the Internet coming out of Lakewood that will take place in New York next week at Citi Field has provided a lot of fodder for people to discuss. I chose not to discuss it until now, as I found the discussion perplexing.
I see nothing wrong with putting together the asifa, even though I doubt anything serious will come out of it. Just the opposite - it is about time they dealt with educating people in how to use it responsibly rather than banning it. Even though they are coming from the perspective of the internet is bad and only as a last resort can it be used and then only in this way, it is still a step in the right direction - educating people about the issues, the dangers, possible solutions.. I see nothing wrong with that.
The politics surrounding the asifa were a bit juicier (asisi in Hebrew). Women were disinvited by request of some hassidic groups, some hassidim wanted other hassidim disinvited, some were invited as guests but not invited to speak and present, the Modern Orthodox communities felt slighted by not being invited despite the event being called an event of unity, the organizer of the asifa is an accused abuser etc. etc. etc.
The two most interesting aspects of the asifa that I have seen are these:
1. Rav Matisyahu Solomon went to Israel to garner the support and direction of the Israeli gedolim.. He actually invited Rav Chaim Kanievsky to fly to American to attend the asifa, considering how important it is and as a way of showing the public how important the gedolim consider it. He did so despite knowing that Rav Chaim Kanievsky, like his father-in-law Rav Elyashiv, does not leave Eretz Yisrael.
Rav Chaim Kanievsky reportedly responded that he would be there and he would bring his father-in-law (Rav Elyashiv). Rav Solomon asked how he would bring Rav Elyashiv (considering how Rav Elyashiv has been laid up in a hospital for the past months), and Rav Kanievsky responded that the same way he would be there, in spirit, he would bring his father in law as well, but they would not be able to attend physically as they don't leave Eretz Yisrael.
Sounds to me like Rav Kanievsky has a bit of a sense of humor..
2. Rav Solomon also invited Rav Shteinman to participate, and offered to fly him in by private plane. As well, he invited the Gaavad of the Eida, Rav Tuviah Weiss and offered him a private plane as well. It seems that some have protested the invitation to Rav Shteinman, as they consider him problematic due to his support for the Nahal Haredi unit in the IDF. Rav Weiss could not fly together with Rav Shteinman because of that, so they each needed to be offered separate airplanes. Being as that neither has yet committed to flying in, sitting at the same dais together (even at opposite ends) is unlikely to present a problem.
While ironic that a public display of unity has to overcome such crazy fighting and discord among different groups, like a family feud of mountain people, unity is looking for the common threads we share with each other and learning to respect (or maybe ignore) the differences...
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
I see nothing wrong with putting together the asifa, even though I doubt anything serious will come out of it. Just the opposite - it is about time they dealt with educating people in how to use it responsibly rather than banning it. Even though they are coming from the perspective of the internet is bad and only as a last resort can it be used and then only in this way, it is still a step in the right direction - educating people about the issues, the dangers, possible solutions.. I see nothing wrong with that.
The politics surrounding the asifa were a bit juicier (asisi in Hebrew). Women were disinvited by request of some hassidic groups, some hassidim wanted other hassidim disinvited, some were invited as guests but not invited to speak and present, the Modern Orthodox communities felt slighted by not being invited despite the event being called an event of unity, the organizer of the asifa is an accused abuser etc. etc. etc.
The two most interesting aspects of the asifa that I have seen are these:
1. Rav Matisyahu Solomon went to Israel to garner the support and direction of the Israeli gedolim.. He actually invited Rav Chaim Kanievsky to fly to American to attend the asifa, considering how important it is and as a way of showing the public how important the gedolim consider it. He did so despite knowing that Rav Chaim Kanievsky, like his father-in-law Rav Elyashiv, does not leave Eretz Yisrael.
Rav Chaim Kanievsky reportedly responded that he would be there and he would bring his father-in-law (Rav Elyashiv). Rav Solomon asked how he would bring Rav Elyashiv (considering how Rav Elyashiv has been laid up in a hospital for the past months), and Rav Kanievsky responded that the same way he would be there, in spirit, he would bring his father in law as well, but they would not be able to attend physically as they don't leave Eretz Yisrael.
Sounds to me like Rav Kanievsky has a bit of a sense of humor..
2. Rav Solomon also invited Rav Shteinman to participate, and offered to fly him in by private plane. As well, he invited the Gaavad of the Eida, Rav Tuviah Weiss and offered him a private plane as well. It seems that some have protested the invitation to Rav Shteinman, as they consider him problematic due to his support for the Nahal Haredi unit in the IDF. Rav Weiss could not fly together with Rav Shteinman because of that, so they each needed to be offered separate airplanes. Being as that neither has yet committed to flying in, sitting at the same dais together (even at opposite ends) is unlikely to present a problem.
While ironic that a public display of unity has to overcome such crazy fighting and discord among different groups, like a family feud of mountain people, unity is looking for the common threads we share with each other and learning to respect (or maybe ignore) the differences...
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------
Jan 15, 2012
The Vacuum of Jewish leadership
I am not quite sure what to think of this...
Haaretz has an editorial about the vacuum of leadership the Jewish world is facing. It really makes two separate points:
What do you think? About both points - is the leadership propped up far longer than they are actual leaders? It actually makes it seem almost evil, propping up these old rabbonim for appearances sake alone, not allowing them to live out their last years peacefully. We often discredit claims made in their name, but it is true to this extent, that they have absolutely no idea what is going on? And, are our yeshivas not really producing future leaders? is it not possible because of the scrutiny applied nowadays?
Haaretz has an editorial about the vacuum of leadership the Jewish world is facing. It really makes two separate points:
- The leaders are really just propped up far longer than they are actually able to lead. Examples of this are the last Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rav Shach and currently Rav Elyashiv, along with other unnamed examples.
- In the yeshiva system of today, the future leaders, gedolim, are not being , and really cannot be, developed.
From Haaretz:
On the top floor of a Jerusalem hospital lays a very old man. He is slowly dying, but he won't be left in peace. A small circle of courtiers around him continue to issue in his name edicts and rulings, ensure that his signature still appears on letters and when his medical situation improves temporarily, they will remove him from hospital and seat him in his chair at the synagogue, where everyone can see him. The hospital staff grumbles that all this just prolongs the old man's agony, but there is nothing they can do as the retinue controls all the old man's moves.
Only a tiny handful of relatives and trustees are allowed to talk with him, and they jealously guard his real mental situation while everyone is told that he is fully lucid and talking with his family and doctors, praying and studying as normal.
This is how the great rabbis die nowadays. These were the circumstances of the last years of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, as the Chabadniks fought over him, manhandling him to the window of his study so he could wave to the crowds on Eastern Parkway, steadily deifying him as he descended into his last coma. His body died in 1994, at the age of 92, but many of his followers still believe he is with us.
Rabbi Elazar Menachem Shach suffered similar indignities when visitors to his home in Bnei Brak were shown the volume of Talmud he was studying from, but were not told he had been on the same page for 10 years. Just before he turned 100, he was finally allowed to retreat from the public stage and given a few years of rest before he died at the age of 102.
The retainers of Kabbalist miracle-maker Yitzhak Kadouri bodily carried him to events well into his 11th decade, making sure he muttered the required incantations, shouting in his near-deaf ear the names of those to be blessed, and continued a brisk trade in his handwritten amulets until death finally liberated him from their clutches at 106.
Momentous rulings
By some accounts, 101-year-old Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, the great sage of the "Lithuanian" ultra-Orthodox community, is undergoing the same treatment as these words are being written. For months now he is being shuttled back and forth from hospital to his tiny apartment in Mea She'arim; but despite growing reports on his frailty, he still seems capable of publishing momentous rulings on the pages of Yated Ne'eman, such as the one that appeared two weeks ago forbidding Haredi men and women from participating in military or academic vocational courses under non-Haredi auspices. While there are those who treat these verdicts as the word from up on high, speculation is growing that for months now, if not years, Rabbi Elyashiv's name has been appended to endorsements and prohibitions he has never heard of.
Modern medicine has created an intractable theological dilemma for Haredi Jewry. While it prolongs the lives of rabbis well in to their 90s and beyond, it does not guarantee soundness of mind. But how can a community brought up on the doctrine of "Da'at Torah," rabbinical infallibility, accept that their leaders' memory and reasoning can deteriorate. They liken their rabbis in old age to Moses, whom the Torah tells us that at the age of 120, "his eye was not darkened, nor his moisture ceased." And above all, their mind, this god-given gift to an entire nation, surely cannot fail, only gain strength and wisdom. But that is simply not the way of the human body.
And human nature being what it is, those surrounding the great rabbis are reluctant to relinquish their meal ticket. For decades they have derived a living and social standing from a proximity to his holiness - it is too much to expect that they supply the faithful with an accurate account of the revered sage's medical condition. To publicly admit to his physical limitations is tantamount to transferring power to a rival court.
Generation gap
But the inability to own up to a great rabbi's frailness goes beyond theology and avariciousness. There is literally no replacement to this dying generation of nonagenarians and centenarians. Elyashiv earned the title "Posek Ha-dor," the arbiter of the generation, decades ago - long before he replaced Shach as the supreme leader of the Lithuanians. But his followers have splintered into warring sects and there is no other rabbi today with such a consensus behind him.
Likewise, among the "Admorim," the hereditary leaders of the Hassidic dynasties, there is no figure who commands respect that transcends their courts - most of them have trouble keeping even their own flock together. Lubavitch did not appoint a successor to Schneerson - how could anyone stand in the messiah's place? Neither does the Sephardi ultra-Orthodox community have a viable candidate to fill 91-year-old Rabbi Ovadia Yosef's gigantic shoes when the day comes. His sons are already quarreling over his estate, but none of them will command anything near the same authority and they certainly won't allow an outsider to prevail.
And while there is no shortage of wizards, soothsayers and wonder-doers, the fierce competition between them assures that we will not see another "Zekan Ha-mekubalim," elder of the kabbalists, after Kadouri.
Ultra-Orthodoxy is the fastest-growing demographic in the Jewish world, not just in Israel but in the United States, Canada, Britain, France and other major communities as well, but it is facing a leadership vacuum. The yeshivas are booming, the number of men with a comprehensive grounding in all fields of Torah and Talmudic learning is unprecedented in Jewish history, but their prospects of one day becoming a venerated Gadol ha-Dor, the greatest in the generation, are nil.
The younger generation of rabbis are today under a level of scrutiny their predecessors never had to undergo. The details of their personal lives and foibles are circulated on websites. Rival factions have multiple channels through which to disseminate damaging gossip and promote their own champions. The mythologization necessary in constructing the image of a gadol is impossible. The successful resurrection of the yeshivas after the ravages of the Holocaust produced thousands of charismatic and learned rabbis. The market of Torah greatness is wide open and no competitor has a chance of cornering it.
In previous generations, leading rabbis could rely on the relative ignorance of most of their followers, who could not spend decades of their own in study, but tens - if not hundreds - of thousands of Haredi men, and a small but increasing number of women, are capable today of analyzing rabbinical rulings and picking and choosing their preferred rabbi.
It is impossible to predict how the ultra-Orthodox community will evolve in this new era of choice. Will rabbis try and rival each other with excessively hardline edicts, or will there be competition with those trying to liberalize Haredi ideology, making it more compatible with a modern lifestyle? Most likely we will see both these developments simultaneously.
As the last of the generation of rabbis born in the early 20th century close their eyes, an age of rabbinical hegemony is coming to an end.
Labels:
gedolim,
leadership,
rabbonim
Jan 9, 2012
Rav Yaakov, Rav Kook And Rav Sonnenfeld
I read two interesting stories recently that I want to share with you. They are not connected to each other. just two separate stories (I guess one could figure out and make drashos how to connect them, but I am not going to do that).
The first is from AMI magazine, and the second is from an alon shabbat put out by an organization called Rosh Yehudi.
The first is from AMI magazine, and the second is from an alon shabbat put out by an organization called Rosh Yehudi.
- Rav Mordechai Laminetsky related this story of his grandfather, Rav Yaakov Kaminetzky, zt"l.
Rav Yaakov had gone into a small siyum celebration by a simple Jew named Yankele. Rav Yaakov wanted to congratulate him for finishing the portion he had learned, and then he sat down.
The gabbai got up shortly after and announced "And now our good friend reb Yankele will say the hadran, the closing paragraph, thus finishing the tractate."
Rav Yaakov didn't realize the gabbai was referring to the much younger host whose name was Yankele. He stood up and apologized saying that as he did not do the learning, he should not be the one to render the closing ceremony.
As Rav Mordechai Kaminetzky writes, "in his immense humility one of the oldest and most revered sages of the generation still replied when he thought he heard himself addressed as Reb Yankele, a name affectionately used for an unpretentious younger person."
- My friend Baruch Kelman scanned the Rosh Yehudi alon with the following story and sent it to me.
This story was told over by the assistant of Rav Kook, zt"l, and was told to the writer by his grandson. In the early years of Rav Kook's presence in Jerusalem, he went to a government ceremony with a performance. At the event there was a reception for the people to meet and see Rav kook, and his gabbai, along with Rav Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld, zt"l.
Suddenly, a the performance, a female singer took the stage and began singing and dancing. Rav Kook immediately got up and ran out of the area. Rav Sonnenfeld in the meantime stayed in his seat and stuck his fingers in his ears, looked down while shaking his head and didn't pay attention.
His gabbai asked him, how is it that you the kannoi could stay in and just not pay attention that while Rav Kook, who is not a kannoi, ran out?
Rav Sonnenfeld responded that it is against "kvod hamalchus" to leave, which is why he stayed. Rav Kook, on the other hand, was so careful about not listening to women sing that he was not willing to listen to the singer even at the price of causing damage to the kvod hamalchus.
Take what lessons you will from these stories.
Labels:
gedolim
May 5, 2011
Interesting Psak from rav Chaim Kanievsky: Fighting Over the Afikomen
Can you imagine fighting over the afikomen, who found it, who deserves the prize, who worked harder to find it, etc.? Of course you can! It happens in just about every household that has more than one child. But can you imagine suing your sibling over the afikomen present? taking him to beis din to fight over it? going to one of the gedolei ha'dor for a psak as to who deserves it?
Bechadrei is reporting on the incident of a father coming to rav Chaim Kanievsky with an interesting question. He said that at the seder in their house the younger child succeeded in "stealing the afikomen". Unfortunately for him, he fell asleep before it was time to return it to the father. The older brother went and took it and claimed the afikomen prize. The question is which son deserves the prize.
Now, I think, most people would probably just give both kids a prize as a resolution, as long as the prize would not be too expensive. This fellow decided to waste the time of the gadol ha'dor with the question, rather than take it to his local rav. This reminds me of something Rabbi Dovid Landesman wrote in his two books of Jewish essays "There Are No Basketball Courts In Heaven" and "Food For Thought: No Hechsher Required" that many people are going to need to answer in heaven for the amount of time they wasted of the gedolim, taking them away from their learning, to ask questions that could have just as well been asked of regular rabbonim, or resolved on their own.
Rav Chaim responded with an interesting psak. he said that it does not matter that the younger son stole it. It was the older son who returned it, and that is who gets the prize.
Parenthetically, Rav Chaim added, that he opposes the practice of stealing the afikomen and considers it inappropriate. he said it teaches the children to steal. He said that his uncle the Chazon Ish and his father, the Steipler, were both opposed to this custom as well. Growing up, we never stole the afikomen. What we did in our family was by Yachatz my father would break the matza in half and then go hide it. We later had to look for it and whoever found it returned it to him. My kids on the other hand steal it, because that is what the more common custom is in Israel and that is how they think it needs to be done. I always forget, until it is too late, to warn them in advance that I want to hide it. Maybe having read this psak of Rav Chaim it will help me remember in the future.
![]() |
| the matza is split, do the kids have to be? |
Now, I think, most people would probably just give both kids a prize as a resolution, as long as the prize would not be too expensive. This fellow decided to waste the time of the gadol ha'dor with the question, rather than take it to his local rav. This reminds me of something Rabbi Dovid Landesman wrote in his two books of Jewish essays "There Are No Basketball Courts In Heaven" and "Food For Thought: No Hechsher Required" that many people are going to need to answer in heaven for the amount of time they wasted of the gedolim, taking them away from their learning, to ask questions that could have just as well been asked of regular rabbonim, or resolved on their own.
Rav Chaim responded with an interesting psak. he said that it does not matter that the younger son stole it. It was the older son who returned it, and that is who gets the prize.
Parenthetically, Rav Chaim added, that he opposes the practice of stealing the afikomen and considers it inappropriate. he said it teaches the children to steal. He said that his uncle the Chazon Ish and his father, the Steipler, were both opposed to this custom as well. Growing up, we never stole the afikomen. What we did in our family was by Yachatz my father would break the matza in half and then go hide it. We later had to look for it and whoever found it returned it to him. My kids on the other hand steal it, because that is what the more common custom is in Israel and that is how they think it needs to be done. I always forget, until it is too late, to warn them in advance that I want to hide it. Maybe having read this psak of Rav Chaim it will help me remember in the future.
Dec 1, 2010
Which has priority - lighting or watching candles be lit?
I saw in shul today a pile of pamphlets containing a listing of all the gedolim (I don't know how inclusive the list is - I did not even really read the list) and what time, and where, they each light their Chanukah candles.
The purpose is, obviously, to allow the people the ability to go to the gedolim of their choice and watch them light their menorahs.
Personally, I am not a "groupie" of any specific gadol, and going to watch them light candles is not something at the top of my "to do" list. However, I do recognize that other people do enjoy that kind of stuff, and either pick the gadol they want to watch or they make the rounds among various gedolim and watch as many as they can. I recognize the desire to be inspired, even just by watching an important rav light candles.
I do wonder though, as I was glancing at the pamphlet, how this jives with halacha. If you are going after the hassidic rebbes in the list, it should work out ok for the most part. Many of them light later in the evening, so a regular person could light his candles at the proper time and then go to the rebbe of his choice. The litvishe rebbes (I call them "rebbes" because the litvishe community has become very hassidic in style in the past 15 years or so in the way they treat their gedolim and rabbonim) on the other hand all light at the same time the regular people are supposed to be lighting at -eith the sunset minhag or the tzeis minhag. So halachically speaking is it ok to not light on time because you want to drive out to Bnei Braq to watch Rav Steinman or Rav Kanievsky (or whichever other one you prefer) light their candles?
The purpose is, obviously, to allow the people the ability to go to the gedolim of their choice and watch them light their menorahs.
Personally, I am not a "groupie" of any specific gadol, and going to watch them light candles is not something at the top of my "to do" list. However, I do recognize that other people do enjoy that kind of stuff, and either pick the gadol they want to watch or they make the rounds among various gedolim and watch as many as they can. I recognize the desire to be inspired, even just by watching an important rav light candles.
I do wonder though, as I was glancing at the pamphlet, how this jives with halacha. If you are going after the hassidic rebbes in the list, it should work out ok for the most part. Many of them light later in the evening, so a regular person could light his candles at the proper time and then go to the rebbe of his choice. The litvishe rebbes (I call them "rebbes" because the litvishe community has become very hassidic in style in the past 15 years or so in the way they treat their gedolim and rabbonim) on the other hand all light at the same time the regular people are supposed to be lighting at -eith the sunset minhag or the tzeis minhag. So halachically speaking is it ok to not light on time because you want to drive out to Bnei Braq to watch Rav Steinman or Rav Kanievsky (or whichever other one you prefer) light their candles?
Oct 12, 2010
Rav Amnon Yitzchak's Letter Against The Jewish Singers
Rav Amnon Yitzchak has signed the gedolim on his letter against the Jewish singers and is now publicizing his letter.
In light of this, I point out:
- Rav Elyashiv signed, despite having said he would not. What's that all about? Change of mind? He never said no? His askanim were paid off?
- What is the alternative for entertainment and pleasure for the hamon am, in his ideal world where there is no Jewish music industry?
- He says concerts are prohibited even if they are completely separate. Why? And if so, when Rav Amnon Yitzchak was attacking those who perform before mixed audiences and accepted their teshuva when they agreed to only perform before separate audiences, is he now going to attack them again?
- Newspapers can't advertise such performers - Is this only directed at the Yated, as all other newspapers are not allowed to be printed at all anyway?
Jul 5, 2010
Holding out for a dira/tefilla
The recent edition of Hashavua newspaper (a haredi newspaper) wrote about an interesting, and confounding, situation that was brought to the gedolim recently.
The story goes that Rav Yitzchak Zilbershtein, the rav of Ramat Elchonon in Bnei Braq, related that he recently received a letter from a group of sem teachers (Israeli seminary which is higher education for Bais Yaakov girls) that wrote to him about their students that are taking a long time to find a shidduch because the good bochurim insist on holding out for the promise of an apartment, yet they cannot agree to it knowing that their parents, sometimes themselves avreichim, are not able to afford it. Yet they don't want to "settle" for second class bochurim. So they end up sitting around and becoming old maids (my words). The letter was asking what they could/should do.
I imagine the petitioners were hoping that the gedolim would renew their push to stop the boshurim from demanding such ridiculous demands, as the gedolim have supported publicly the many initiatives that have been suggested for lessening the burden on the parents.
Yet they were sorely disappointed.
Rav Zilbershtein tookthe letter to his father in law, Rav Elyashiv. Rav Elyashiv's response was that they should daven, and daven harder and more.
When Rav Zilbershtein told them of Rav Elyashiv's response, they cried out that we have been davening and that is all we do, yet we sit here with no shidduchim. What can be done.
Rav Zilbershtein took the letter to Rav Shteinman. Rav Shteinman too has publicly supported such initiatives to lessen the burden, yet again he did not take that track of telling the yeshivas to stop the crazy demands.
Rav Shteinmans response was t compare ti to the case in the neviim of the wife of the prophet Ovadiah who davened 265 times before her prayers were answered. Rav Shteinman said that at 264 they weren't answered, but only at 265. She needed that last extra prayer. These young women as well should continue davening, as perhaps it will be the next tefilla that gets them over the hump and gets them the shidduch.
What is the point in supporting initiatives if when push comes to shove you don't insist on the new policy? Of course they should daven, and if that is all they can do, that is what they should continue to do. But on the other hand, from the guys perspective, if this opportunity is not taken to try to push the new communal policy of not making ridiculous demands, when will it ever take hold in the community?
אם לא עכשיו אימתי?
The story goes that Rav Yitzchak Zilbershtein, the rav of Ramat Elchonon in Bnei Braq, related that he recently received a letter from a group of sem teachers (Israeli seminary which is higher education for Bais Yaakov girls) that wrote to him about their students that are taking a long time to find a shidduch because the good bochurim insist on holding out for the promise of an apartment, yet they cannot agree to it knowing that their parents, sometimes themselves avreichim, are not able to afford it. Yet they don't want to "settle" for second class bochurim. So they end up sitting around and becoming old maids (my words). The letter was asking what they could/should do.
I imagine the petitioners were hoping that the gedolim would renew their push to stop the boshurim from demanding such ridiculous demands, as the gedolim have supported publicly the many initiatives that have been suggested for lessening the burden on the parents.
Yet they were sorely disappointed.
Rav Zilbershtein tookthe letter to his father in law, Rav Elyashiv. Rav Elyashiv's response was that they should daven, and daven harder and more.
When Rav Zilbershtein told them of Rav Elyashiv's response, they cried out that we have been davening and that is all we do, yet we sit here with no shidduchim. What can be done.
Rav Zilbershtein took the letter to Rav Shteinman. Rav Shteinman too has publicly supported such initiatives to lessen the burden, yet again he did not take that track of telling the yeshivas to stop the crazy demands.
Rav Shteinmans response was t compare ti to the case in the neviim of the wife of the prophet Ovadiah who davened 265 times before her prayers were answered. Rav Shteinman said that at 264 they weren't answered, but only at 265. She needed that last extra prayer. These young women as well should continue davening, as perhaps it will be the next tefilla that gets them over the hump and gets them the shidduch.
What is the point in supporting initiatives if when push comes to shove you don't insist on the new policy? Of course they should daven, and if that is all they can do, that is what they should continue to do. But on the other hand, from the guys perspective, if this opportunity is not taken to try to push the new communal policy of not making ridiculous demands, when will it ever take hold in the community?
אם לא עכשיו אימתי?
Feb 14, 2010
Rav Yehoshua Maman
Mishpacha magazine (Hebrew) had a great profile article on Rav Yehoshua Maman. Rav Maman is a 92 year old brilliant Moroccan Rabbi, descended from a line of great rabbis and with lineage traced back to the Rambam, who moved to Israel in 1968, right as he was about to be appointed as Chief Rabbi of Morocco. He said that he felt drawn to Eretz Yisrael and preferred to move rather than stay and be Chief Rabbi.
Many interesting anecdotes about his life and details we were related. One particular anecdote struck a chord with me.
The story goes like this:
Right after he moved to Israel, the Chief Rabbi of Israel, Rav Yitzchak Nissim offered him the job of being the head of a special beis din for gittin issues.
Rav Maman refused the job.
The reason Rav Maman gave for refusing the job was that as a dayan (and chief rabbi of a few different major cities) for 22 years in Morocco never once did he process a divorce - he successfully established shalom bayit in the house and avoided the need for the get. Only once did he do a get, yet after 3 months he succeeded in effecting shalom bayit between them and got them back together.
So after 22 years of not giving a get but effecting shalom bayit, he could not fathom coming to Israel and making a parnassa out of facilitating people give gets. He said, "Here in Eretz Yisrael I should make a living out of dismantling families?..."
Many interesting anecdotes about his life and details we were related. One particular anecdote struck a chord with me.
The story goes like this:
Right after he moved to Israel, the Chief Rabbi of Israel, Rav Yitzchak Nissim offered him the job of being the head of a special beis din for gittin issues.
Rav Maman refused the job.
The reason Rav Maman gave for refusing the job was that as a dayan (and chief rabbi of a few different major cities) for 22 years in Morocco never once did he process a divorce - he successfully established shalom bayit in the house and avoided the need for the get. Only once did he do a get, yet after 3 months he succeeded in effecting shalom bayit between them and got them back together.
So after 22 years of not giving a get but effecting shalom bayit, he could not fathom coming to Israel and making a parnassa out of facilitating people give gets. He said, "Here in Eretz Yisrael I should make a living out of dismantling families?..."
Labels:
gedolim
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




